| From: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Imai, Yoshikazu" <imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: pg_restore --convert-to-text |
| Date: | 2019-03-16 22:54:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAHE3wgjr9ADdVBhZM+ZBBzdapzHmCBTpYXpKNVLv1u2iw-Nv3A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Em qua, 27 de fev de 2019 às 23:48, Imai, Yoshikazu
<imai(dot)yoshikazu(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> escreveu:
>
> Is there no need to rewrite the Description in the Doc to state we should specify either -d or -f option?
> (and also it might be better to write if -l option is given, neither -d nor -f option isn't necessarily needed.)
>
I don't think so. The description is already there (see "pg_restore
can operate in two modes..."). I left -l as is which means that
'pg_restore -l foo.dump' dumps to standard output and 'pg_restore -f -
-l foo.dump' has the same behavior).
> I think the former one looks like pretty, but which one is preffered?
>
I don't have a style preference but decided to change to your
suggestion. New version attached.
--
Euler Taveira Timbira -
http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3-0001-pg_restore-supports-stdout-in-file.patch | text/x-patch | 5.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Cleveland | 2019-03-16 23:24:11 | Possible to modify query language in an extension? |
| Previous Message | Ryan Lambert | 2019-03-16 22:43:43 | Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE |