Re: [PATCH] Support reading large objects with pg_read_all_data

> Here's what I have staged for commit. I didn't understand the reasoning
> behind not giving pg_write_all_data privileges on large objects.

Thanks Nathan. My thinking behind this was that even without these
changes, the 'select *' on the large object table worked for
pg_read_all_data so providing access to functions like lo_get seemed
consistent with that behaviour. But for pg_write_all_data, that wasn't
the case so I thought it might be safer not to provide access.

> commit message mentions that "granting write access would imply write
> permissions on a system catalog" (which I assume is referring to
> pg_largeobject), but if granting UPDATE on a large object is sufficient to
> allow updating portions of that catalog, then I see no reason to be so
> strict with pg_write_all_data. It still doesn't allow updating the catalog
> directly.
>

Thanks for the explanation and taking care of this.

Regards,
Nitin Motiani
Google