Re: Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes

From: Nitin Motiani <nitinmotiani(at)google(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hannu Krosing <hannuk(at)google(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding pg_dump flag for parallel export to pipes
Date: 2025-09-09 15:11:24
Message-ID: CAH5HC95i8zcg5smHB=X3dmHt1Edi4uNSdDuH1y=kCNex5PV0_g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 9, 2025 at 12:07 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>
> The latest patch set is not applying on HEAD can you rebase the patch
> set. And also there are many TODOs in the patch, if those TODOs are
> just good to do and you are planning for future development better to
> get rid of those. OTOH if some of those TODOs are mandatory to do
> before we can commit the patch then are you planning to work on those
> soon? I am planning to review this patch so are you planning to send
> the rebased version with implementing the TODO which are required for
> the first version.
>

Thanks for the feedback, Dilip. We will rebase the patch soon and send
it. Regarding the TODOs, some of those are plans for future
development (i.e. refactor). There are also TODOs in the first patch
file 0001 which are actually removed in file 0002. We can clean those
up or combine the two files. Other than that, some are about the open
questions. We will remove those from the code and will discuss those
issues on the thread.

Thanks,
Nitin Motiani
Google

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2025-09-09 15:12:36 Re: OAuth client code doesn't work with Google OAuth
Previous Message Nitin Motiani 2025-09-09 15:03:42 Re: [PATCH] Accept connections post recovery without waiting for RemoveOldXlogFiles