Re: What is an item pointer, anyway?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: What is an item pointer, anyway?
Date: 2019-05-13 18:50:26
Message-ID: CAH2-WznuBNSqWTBqHd+aCbiSK0qOhJnxdg-man75O4ii4Y4FPg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 5, 2019 at 1:14 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Attached draft patch adjusts code comments and error messages where a
> line pointer is referred to as an item pointer. It turns out that this
> practice isn't all that prevalent. Here are some specific concerns
> that I had to think about when writing the patch, though:

Ping? Any objections to pushing ahead with this?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-05-13 19:33:17 Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils
Previous Message Andrew Gierth 2019-05-13 18:39:14 Re: SQL-spec incompatibilities in similar_escape() and related stuff