Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standardizing how pg_waldump presents recovery conflict XID cutoffs
Date: 2022-11-17 22:57:12
Message-ID: CAH2-WznnC87TZvrpGO-h_1uJS-zQeR8BP=F9uWGPgxoUfDH97g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 9:02 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> Plan is to commit this later on today, barring objections.

Pushed, thanks.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 正华吕 2022-11-17 23:31:18 Re: Don't treate IndexStmt like AlterTable when DefineIndex is called from ProcessUtilitySlow.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-11-17 22:47:50 Re: Strange failure on mamba