| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: WIP: Covering + unique indexes. |
| Date: | 2018-04-07 20:56:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WznnBKxS9UkELeaxHqmNmRLnV70vm_UbFrm2YDh_ukQZRw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 1:52 PM, Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> Support for testing amcaninclude via
> pg_indexam_has_property(oid,'can_include') seems to be missing?
>
> Also the return values of pg_index_column_has_property for included
> columns seem a bit dubious... should probably be returning NULL for most
> properties except 'returnable'.
>
> I can look at fixing these for you if you like?
I'm happy to accept your help with it, for one.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2018-04-07 20:57:32 | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Incremental sort |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2018-04-07 20:55:36 | Re: Removing useless DISTINCT clauses |