Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Reducing the WAL overhead of freezing in VACUUM by deduplicating per-tuple freeze plans
Date: 2023-01-12 01:32:18
Message-ID: CAH2-WznmPp7UfGncNTjyrnsjAr62YvLH+fZP+kGW=6KRzZ=yTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:44 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Attached patch fixes up these issues. It's almost totally mechanical.
>
> Looks better, thanks!

Pushed that just now.

Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yoshikazu Imai (Fujitsu) 2023-01-12 02:15:56 RE: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-01-12 01:17:27 Re: No Callbacks on FATAL