Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, marcelo zen <mzen(at)itapua(dot)com(dot)uy>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreas(at)visena(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?
Date: 2020-02-15 01:09:42
Message-ID: CAH2-WznaF17WSeCd2qTbHgPqxiVHQEHuM+aLQFTnhXkY+TZCAQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 1:34 PM Andrew Dunstan
<andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I also object because 20 is *my* unlucky number ...

I don't think we're going to do this, so you don't have to worry on that score.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashwin Agrawal 2020-02-15 01:29:01 Re: Use LN_S instead of "ln -s" in Makefile
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2020-02-15 01:03:13 Re: Just for fun: Postgres 20?