Re: Lowering the ever-growing heap->pd_lower

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lowering the ever-growing heap->pd_lower
Date: 2022-03-14 18:33:57
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzn_=sbXzeXU07skUsNrA89SRoD8ZEhz40=JmudwHkC-xA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 5:49 AM Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I double-checked the changes, and to me it seems like that was the
> only place in the code where PageGetMaxOffsetNumber was not handled
> correctly. This was fixed in the latest patch (v8).
>
> Peter, would you have time to further review this patch and/or commit it?

I'll definitely review it some more before too long.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2022-03-14 18:34:42 Re: Issue with pg_stat_subscription_stats
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-03-14 18:27:32 Re: obsolete reference to a SubPlan field