| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k(dot)knizhnik(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |
| Date: | 2019-04-15 18:58:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WznPCX1Kp+SKoPTZ5VH9y=OEA_L+SZ6GO2DLeZasnRCGWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 11:35 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> We do need to limit what we accept into core PG. I do not buy your
> argument that users expect everything to be in core. Or more accurately,
> the people who do think that way won't be using PG anyway --- they'll
> be using MSSQL because it comes from their OS vendor.
I am also concerned by the broad scope of ZedStore, and I tend to
agree that it will be difficult to maintain in core. At the same time,
I think that Andres and Robert are probably right about the difficulty
of maintaining it outside of core -- that would be difficult to
impossible as a practical matter.
Unfortunately, you're both right. I don't know where that leaves us.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2019-04-15 19:04:46 | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |
| Previous Message | Ashwin Agrawal | 2019-04-15 18:57:49 | Re: Zedstore - compressed in-core columnar storage |