Re: GiST VACUUM

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Костя Кузнецов <chapaev28(at)ya(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: GiST VACUUM
Date: 2019-07-24 18:02:13
Message-ID: CAH2-WznOjh1nYz_grTYGR91ALA3qMd+nWN+0F=N3n8NecLvi6w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 10:30 AM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Pushed this now, to master and REL_12_STABLE.
>
> Now, B-tree indexes still have the same problem, in all versions. Any
> volunteers to write a similar fix for B-trees?

I was hoping that you'd work on it. :-)

Any reason to think that it's much different to what you've done with GiST?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2019-07-24 18:32:58 Re: GiST VACUUM
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-24 17:49:00 Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction