Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables versus wraparound... again
Date: 2023-04-14 15:18:24
Message-ID: CAH2-WznNPdXKSkeX=2S+Jb6i9+BZea4FF+zTJ37sMVsYPGsVfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 14, 2023 at 7:05 AM Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> wrote:
> But I'm saying the parenthetical part is not just confusing, it's
> outright wrong. I guess that just means the first half was so
> confusing it confused not only the reader but the author too.

I knew that that was what you meant. I agree that it's outright wrong.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2023-04-14 15:25:34 Re: Should we remove vacuum_defer_cleanup_age?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-14 14:31:48 Where are we on supporting LLVM's opaque-pointer changes?