Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date: 2017-11-14 19:37:58
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzn9_6zXUs1zhjMjneNYmzMJP-XMJGM03ixbW-TWKsvZ2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> That's a good place to leave this for now - we're OK to make progress
> with the main feature, and we have some questions to be addressed once
> we have a cake to decorate.
>
> Thanks for your input.

Thanks for listening. I regret that it became heated, but I'm glad
that we now understand each other's perspective. I'm also glad that
you're pushing ahead with MERGE as a project, because MERGE is
certainly a compelling feature.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ryan Murphy 2017-11-14 20:04:52 PGLister: how to subscribe to digests instead of getting every email?
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2017-11-14 19:07:20 Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table