| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Date: | 2018-04-01 02:43:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wzn76eCGUonARy-wrVtMHsf+4cvbK_oJAWTLfORTU5ki0w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 3:15 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 2:59 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
>> WFM. I have all the information I need to produce the next revision now.
>
> I might as well post this one first. I'll have 0002 for you in a short while.
Looks like thrips doesn't like this, though other Windows buildfarm
animals are okay with it.
round() is from C99, apparently. I'll investigate a fix.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-04-01 03:08:31 | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Previous Message | Anthony Iliopoulos | 2018-04-01 01:14:46 | Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS |