Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pre-v11 appearances of the word "procedure" in v11 docs
Date: 2018-08-17 19:57:32
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzmy2MSe0KjESxoVifSA7M3PGFtcd46Wt=LeSA5ztazOig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 17, 2018 at 7:15 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Attached are my proposed patches.

I take it that you propose all 3 for backpatch to v11?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-08-17 20:20:53 Re: InsertPgAttributeTuple() and attcacheoff
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-17 18:56:31 Re: [PATCH] Improve geometric types