Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.
Date: 2020-07-30 04:18:44
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmsVvd88W=uE-wSz83PjN-Lz=mme2_jxEhOVVEpEu2CsA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 9:05 PM Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> wrote:
> So my 2ndary suggestion is to conditionalize based on the method rather than
> value of space used.

What's the advantage of doing it that way?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Julien Rouhaud 2020-07-30 04:57:31 Re: IDEA: pg_stat_statements tracking utility statements by tag?
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2020-07-30 04:05:02 Re: HashAgg's batching counter starts at 0, but Hash's starts at 1.