| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: s/pg_attribute_always_inline/pg_always_inline/? |
| Date: | 2026-07-09 06:05:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzmsTCBGt-xOj1QdwnmfJay=jmLr4mZvtt8sR1nBL8QEaQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 8, 2026 at 5:41 PM Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me> wrote:
> So, what shall we do about this? I've been looking at the v29 of the
> index prefetching patch series, which is using this attribute in a bunch
> of places. And that reminded me of this thread.
>
> I guess we should just commit that, so unless someone objects soon I'll
> just do that. ISTM the agreement is to backpatch this too.
+1 to backpatching, along with a compatibility macro that supports the
original spelling on backbranches only.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2026-07-09 06:15:40 | Re: Possible replace of strncpy on xactdesc.c |
| Previous Message | jian he | 2026-07-09 05:55:41 | Re: Row pattern recognition |