GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() vs GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid()

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() vs GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid()
Date: 2021-02-06 20:27:30
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzmes12jFNDcVgpU89Vp=r6uLFrE-MT0fjSWGsE70UiNaA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Why is GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() not named
GlobalVisCheckRemovableFullXid() instead? ISTM that that name makes
much more sense, since it is what I'd expect for a function that is
the "Full XID equivalent" of GlobalVisCheckRemovableXid().

Note also that GlobalVisIsRemovableFullXid() is the only symbol name
matching "GlobalVisIsRemovable*".

Have I missed something?

--
Peter Geoghegan

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2021-02-06 21:39:53 Re: Preserve attstattarget on REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2021-02-06 17:21:08 Re: CLUSTER on partitioned index