Re: Suppressing noise in successful check-world runs

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Suppressing noise in successful check-world runs
Date: 2019-05-24 23:56:09
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzmdd+ywcBPdR9QggTUcbwD8Ns9tOFqqzOYNo7WRbAmvpQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:18 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Yes, I see that too with sufficiently high -j. I believe this is
> what Noah was trying to fix in bd1592e85, but that patch evidently
> needs a bit more work :-(

It would be nice if this was fixed, but I don't see a problem when I
use the optimum number of jobs, so I don't consider it to be urgent.

I'm happy with the new approach, since it avoids the problem of
regression.diffs files that get deleted before I have a chance to take
a look. I should thank Noah for his work on this.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashwin Agrawal 2019-05-25 00:06:25 Confusing error message for REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-05-24 23:29:42 Re: Teach pg_upgrade test to honor NO_TEMP_INSTALL