Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch: Write Amplification Reduction Method (WARM)
Date: 2017-03-25 17:33:37
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmaJtiNjPRQ65ykzo6tiK8iOFKtH+AkRM5dyAu1zzheXA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:54 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am not sure how do you want to binary compare two datums, if you are
> thinking datumIsEqual(), that won't work. I think you need to use
> datatype specific compare function something like what we do in
> _bt_compare().

How will that interact with types like numeric, that have display
scale or similar?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2017-03-25 17:44:32 Re: LWLock optimization for multicore Power machines
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-03-25 17:26:20 Re: pgsql: Allow vacuums to report oldestxmin