| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ideas for a relcache test mode about missing invalidations |
| Date: | 2018-08-03 22:42:22 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzmXcHXa0MKx5a9NiaaCOE4E4T_rnaHa-N4gN-VoWUT8aw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:34 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> I reread through the thread and IUCC, drop_index() is sending
>> inval on the owing relation and invalidation happens (that is,
>
> I finally understand that I was totally inept. This came from
> *the result* of the original -bug thread.
I certainly would not say that you were in any way inept. Perhaps
there is an argument for *also* doing what you propose. I am not
dismissive of your idea.
It seems like a question that should be considered separately, on
another thread. If you still want to pursue it.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-08-04 02:09:18 | Re: hot_standby_feedback vs excludeVacuum and snapshots |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2018-08-03 22:20:58 | Re: Draft release notes are up |