Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes
Date: 2018-08-11 03:11:32
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmR84O+q2PGba=uejsmv_5F=w+0cJnwJOptyW8cwaS+Ug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 8:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Me too. I will absolutely not vote to release 11.0 before we've
> solved this ...

I believe that that's the right call, assuming things don't change.

This is spooky in a way that creates a lot of doubts in my mind. I
don't think it's at all advisable to make an executive decision to
release, while still not having the foggiest idea what's really going
on.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Rofail 2018-08-11 03:20:57 Re: [HACKERS] GSoC 2017: Foreign Key Arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-08-11 03:02:57 Re: buildfarm: could not read block 3 in file "base/16384/2662": read only 0 of 8192 bytes