Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)
Date: 2018-12-18 22:29:14
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmQuksC_sWR8Z0aqxAVC6bBAcwU3bHv=rbf8Hp1RdJjvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 2:26 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Hm, that definitely leads me to feel that we've got bug(s) in
> dependency.c. I'll take a look sometime soon.

Thanks!

I'm greatly relieved that I probably won't have to become an expert on
dependency.c after all. :-)
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-18 22:47:36 Re: [HACKERS] CLUSTER command progress monitor
Previous Message Tom Lane 2018-12-18 22:26:24 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)