From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Show various offset arrays for heap WAL records |
Date: | 2023-01-11 22:53:54 |
Message-ID: | CAH2-WzmPmCQzjzTXFn=z-BFaEodzASUhmdA4CmTAb+zDrdbULw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:35 AM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Nontrivial, I'm afraid. We don't pass any relevant parameters to rm_desc:
> void (*rm_desc) (StringInfo buf, XLogReaderState *record);
>
> so we'd need to patch all of them. That might be worth doing at some point,
> but I don't want to tackle it right now.
Okay. Let's just get the basics in soon, then.
I would like to have a similar capability for index access methods,
but mostly just for investigating performance. Whenever we've really
needed something like this for debugging it seems to have been a
heapam thing, just because there's a lot more that can go wrong with
pruning, which is spread across many different places.
--
Peter Geoghegan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2023-01-11 22:59:07 | Re: Generate pg_stat_get_xact*() functions with Macros |
Previous Message | Corey Huinker | 2023-01-11 22:51:37 | Re: Add SHELL_EXIT_CODE to psql |