Re: strange perf regression with data checksums

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: strange perf regression with data checksums
Date: 2025-05-20 12:46:25
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmNWnuooD6tTdtDygeXVAGPtE=6j_ityTtOL_o7RzFzxA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:43 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> I imagine bitmap index scans will be similar to plain index scans.

To be clear, I meant that the magnitude of the problem will be
similar. I do not mean that they aren't fixed by my v2. They should be
fully fixed by v2.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-05-20 12:46:44 Re: PG 18 release notes draft committed
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-05-20 12:43:16 Re: strange perf regression with data checksums