| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: What is an item pointer, anyway? |
| Date: | 2019-05-13 19:54:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzmM5BB7Gog8mD01T2rn2TmOHS0gtMb4csjQnW60OL518g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 12:38 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> /*
> - * Prune specified item pointer or a HOT chain originating at that item.
> + * Prune specified line pointer or a HOT chain originating at that item.
> *
> * If the item is an index-referenced tuple (i.e. not a heap-only tuple),
>
> Should "that item" also be re-worded, for consistency?
Yes, it should be -- I'll fix it.
I'm going to backpatch the storage.sgml change on its own, while
pushing everything else in a separate HEAD-only commit.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-05-13 19:58:51 | Re: PG12, PGXS and linking pgfeutils |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2019-05-13 19:53:58 | remove doc/bug.template? |