Re: gist microvacuum doesn't appear to care about hot standby?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: gist microvacuum doesn't appear to care about hot standby?
Date: 2018-12-17 19:48:16
Message-ID: CAH2-WzmE1=ynHtcyRdHRqhgV29hYOkk+R_Y7sCbmuzMxzNFjSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 4:41 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I thought about that, but decided it's better to mimic B-tree and hash
> behavior rather than invent new logic in a minor release. But given
> that new WAL record in minor release in substantial problem, that
> argument doesn't matter.

It might be better to mimic B-Tree and hash on the master branch.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hugh Ranalli 2018-12-17 20:22:37 Re: BUG #15548: Unaccent does not remove combining diacritical characters
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-12-17 19:42:50 Re: don't create storage when unnecessary