Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Manuel Rigger <rigger(dot)manuel(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index
Date: 2019-07-10 01:30:56
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm41rs0Ee=zi-qWQVpgZoZkY4aq8_ZBFCUK+BGJrOo47g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 6:08 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The error is coming from the planner's get_actual_variable_range:
>
> /* Shouldn't have got a null, but be careful */
> if (isnull[0])
> elog(ERROR, "found unexpected null value in index \"%s\"",
> RelationGetRelationName(indexRel));
>
> and I think it's entirely within its rights to complain, because it
> set up the scan key to reject nulls. In short, somebody seems to
> have broken btrees' processing of SK_ISNULL | SK_SEARCHNOTNULL scankeys,
> and they broke it in v11, because prior versions don't show this failure.

It's not obvious to me why that might be. I'll run a "git bisect" to
track down the offending commit.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-07-10 01:43:54 Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-07-10 01:08:39 Re: ERROR: found unexpected null value in index