Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies
Date: 2021-04-07 23:41:35
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm26Ea62YWAJnvjjBjKcjAJLQx4zvs6gASP_FSBZ5d6qg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 8:52 AM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> All of the changes from your fixup patch are clear improvements, and
> so I'll include them in the final commit. Thanks!

I did change the defaults of the GUCs to 1.6 billion, though.

All patches in the patch series have been pushed. Hopefully I will not
be the next person to break the buildfarm today.

Thanks Masahiko, and everybody else involved!
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-04-08 00:10:37 Race condition in InvalidateObsoleteReplicationSlots()
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2021-04-07 23:38:35 Re: Feature improvement: can we add queryId for pg_catalog.pg_stat_activity view?