Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(dot)casanova(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partitioned tables and covering indexes
Date: 2018-04-11 21:38:24
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm0qH6BYaYGLFQB+Nz+O+g=k1Goe-ucdC2+8KhHG2KPfQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 2:29 PM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> But in this case it doesn't even do equality comparison, it just returns
> the value.

That's the idea that I tried to express. The point is that we need to
tell the user that there is no need to worry about it, rather than
that they're wrong to ask about it. Though we should probably actually
just throw an error.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonathan S. Katz 2018-04-11 21:40:27 Re: Creation of wiki page for open items of v11
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-04-11 21:31:48 Re: Native partitioning tablespace inheritance