Re: pg15: reltuples stuck at -1 after pg_upgrade and VACUUM

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: pg15: reltuples stuck at -1 after pg_upgrade and VACUUM
Date: 2023-08-09 15:41:21
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm=UwJjO+KgoBu6p1ibn0Bu2_rRNvZk_7fqqE6Z3m3+vQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 6:18 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Perhaps, though, there's a case for forcing all pages to be visited
> if we start with reltuples == -1? I'm not sure it matters much
> though given that you also need an ANALYZE run to be really in a
> good place after pg_upgrade. The ANALYZE should update this.

Right. VACUUM is sometimes much less efficient than just using ANALYZE
to establish an initial reltuples. Other times it is much less
accurate. I can't see any argument for opting to use VACUUM instead of
ANALYZE after an upgrade.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2023-08-09 15:56:48 Re: pgsql: Ignore BRIN indexes when checking for HOT udpates
Previous Message GF 2023-08-09 15:32:22 Re: Adding a pg_servername() function