Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A design for amcheck heapam verification
Date: 2017-08-30 16:29:02
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzm+xNHvZL3tA=5DcFL5rQYsc-VhbWKxq_Fdz7sddFvnUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 5:02 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Eh, if you want to optimize it for the case where debug output is not
> enabled, make sure to use ereport() not elog(). ereport()
> short-circuits evaluation of arguments, whereas elog() does not.

I should do that, but it's still not really noticeable.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-08-30 16:47:38 Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-30 16:12:56 Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order