| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Can ICU be used for a database's default sort order? |
| Date: | 2018-12-06 22:16:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkynOPrzPVLoDckPJrL1jMPRSL2bGgJNHwS6SAciNSZhg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:21 AM Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > About the status of the patch, to me it should be RWF. It's been
> > moved to the next CF several times with no progress besides rebases.
>
> Let me disagree. Judging from the commentaries in this discussion it could be
> significant and useful feature, and the author is trying to keep this patch
> uptodate. The lack of reviews could be due other reasons than desirability of
> the patch (as well as as for many other interesting proposals in hackers).
+1. I, for one, care about this feature. We're all very busy, but I
don't want to see it die.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-12-06 22:22:21 | rewrite ExecPartitionCheckEmitError |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2018-12-06 21:55:52 | don't create storage when unnecessary |