Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kNN for btree
Date: 2020-03-04 01:58:24
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkWrt7F++wEsbUvoDvyB-Cwqp1pyiYTWinaJELtW_Y3bw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 2, 2020 at 1:27 PM Alexander Korotkov
<a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> I've rebased the patchset to the current master and made some
> refactoring. I hope it would be possible to bring it to committable
> shape during this CF. This need more refactoring though.

This patch doesn't change anything about the B-Tree on-disk format -- right?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2020-03-04 02:04:00 Re: Some problems of recovery conflict wait events
Previous Message Euler Taveira 2020-03-04 01:47:22 Re: logical replication empty transactions