Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set
Date: 2019-09-27 21:32:34
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkOzPo53Db-=4L2+irwji_iO0YLUzb460Nk5sSLDXrcig@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 5:28 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Don't think I like ecpg's tests behaving differently in this respect
> than the rest of them do; that seems like a recipe for unrecognized
> security issues.
>
> If nobody can think of a positive reason for pg_regress not to
> unset PGDATABASE unconditionally, let's try that and see how it
> goes.

It would be nice to get this fixed. Several people have been confused
by it at this point.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2019-09-27 21:39:16 Re: ECPG installcheck tests fail if PGDATABASE is set
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-09-27 21:23:48 Re: [HACKERS] "may be unused" warnings for gcc