Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Verite <daniel(at)manitou-mail(dot)org>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values
Date: 2017-08-15 05:16:40
Message-ID: CAH2-WzkEdUenrBeuOPS2Ezvc_Vu1CnqF6903o5DfhCZxkxZR5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 9:56 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
>> I take it that you're in agreement with me on
>> pg_import_system_collations() adding a display name as a comment -- we
>> should prevent that, even for v10?
>
> I'm kind of agnostic on that. I think we've established that that's
> not what we want for v11 and up, but it's not clear to me that the
> current behavior isn't an acceptable short-term answer. If there
> are comments in v10, and then in v11 there aren't because the data
> went somewhere else, what will that really break?

Either way, we might want to point out in the docs that you can pretty
easily find the details of every locale on the web:

https://ssl.icu-project.org/icu-bin/locexp?d_=en&_=en_HK

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2017-08-15 11:31:44 Re: [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-08-15 04:56:46 Re: Crash report for some ICU-52 (debian8) COLLATE and work_mem values

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2017-08-15 05:43:29 Re: INSERT .. ON CONFLICT DO SELECT [FOR ..]
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-08-15 05:16:04 Re: Explicit relation name in VACUUM VERBOSE log