| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Hash index AM fake LSN oversight |
| Date: | 2026-07-14 22:47:30 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-WzkC-opX8iS6X=a470DDC31er_x5rzPw=HjRxha9N8brZw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I noticed a minor oversight in my commit e5836f7b: one remaining hash
index WAL record type lacks a corresponding "PageSetLSN(buf,
XLogGetFakeLSN(rel))" for the unlogged relation case.
This is completely harmless, but it should be fixed on general
principle. Attached patch fixes it.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v1-0001-Advance-fake-LSN-consistently-in-hash-index-AM.patch | application/octet-stream | 831 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zsolt Parragi | 2026-07-14 23:10:51 | Proposal: JSON5 support in the JSON parsers |
| Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-07-14 22:39:48 | Re: Bug: GiST index-only scans can use tuple descriptor with incorrect alignment when deforming |