Re: mxid_age() and age(xid) appear undocumented

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mxid_age() and age(xid) appear undocumented
Date: 2018-07-05 20:30:22
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzk6dPKwFjema9_ABkkNbNYjBcLS-tx=YP1FM7wOcfDKhg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 12:36 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 11:18 PM, David Rowley
> <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> I see d692308cf494f6126 mentions mxid_age() in passing, but there
>> appears to be no formal definition of either of these functions.
>>
>> Should there be?
>
> It seems like a good idea to me.

+1

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2018-07-05 20:36:00 Re: Listing triggers in partitions (was Re: Remove mention in docs that foreign keys on partitioned tables)
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-07-05 19:36:19 Re: mxid_age() and age(xid) appear undocumented