Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rethinking MemoryContext creation
Date: 2017-12-10 07:58:22
Message-ID: CAH2-Wzk4FQq4SpzNp0ppJ78NVMtBSznG=WtU=pxqq=iMQfY1QQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Overall I'm seeing about a 5% improvement in a "pgbench -S" scenario,
> although that number is a bit shaky since the run-to-run variation
> is a few percent anyway.

Is that with "-M prepared", too?

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christian Ullrich 2017-12-10 12:36:13 RE: pl/perl extension fails on Windows
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2017-12-10 05:39:34 Re: Typo in recent commit