Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Floris Van Nee <florisvannee(at)optiver(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andy Fan <zhihui(dot)fan1213(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Index Skip Scan (new UniqueKeys)
Date: 2020-09-22 03:23:24
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=s9aW=eb=N744qYskUJsdfmpvB-KWhEQR9mQUGo5+5oQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:59 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> wrote:
> That's all I have for now.

One more thing. I don't think that this should be a bitwise AND:

if ((offnum > maxoff) & (so->currPos.nextPage == P_NONE))
{
....
}

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2020-09-22 03:33:54 Re: Parallel Full Hash Join
Previous Message Peter Smith 2020-09-22 03:06:15 Re: Load TIME fields - proposed performance improvement