| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |
| Date: | 2017-06-08 18:05:43 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=xN3y-SNP3qMfqpoAcAJBxMARgDBwTWgM59yOT_FdP=w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> More generally, I don't think there's ever a
> time when it's OK to commit a patch that you're not willing to put at
> least some effort into fixing up afterwards.
Kevin said "It has become clear that the scope of problems being found
now exceed what I can be sure of being able to fix in time to make for
a stable release, in spite of the heroic efforts Thomas has been
putting in". I think it's clear that Kevin is willing to put in some
work. The issue is that he is unable to *guarantee* that he'll be able
to put in *sufficient* time, and in light of that concedes that it
might be best to revert and revisit for Postgres 11. He is being
cautious, and does not want to *risk* unduly holding up the release.
That was my understanding, at least.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2017-06-08 18:07:15 | jsonb_to_tsvector should be immutable |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-06-08 17:59:00 | Re: PG10 transition tables, wCTEs and multiple operations on the same table |