Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: First-draft release notes for next week's releases
Date: 2019-02-10 18:24:18
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=v49sm5zJ86fxipKVM8MNS7ir_=YLSHMaG7LcHm4rC2A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 10:05 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> > On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:00 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The v10 release notes just say
>
> Reduce page locking during vacuuming of <acronym>GIN</acronym> indexes
> (Andrey Borodin)
>
> so it doesn't seem like there's any difference at that level of detail.
> But I'll expand the new release note, say
>
> This change partially reverts a performance improvement, introduced
> in version 10, that attempted to reduce the number of index pages
> locked during deletion of a GIN posting tree page. That's now been
> found to lead to deadlocks, so we've removed it pending closer
> analysis.

That plan seems sensible to me. The wording looks good, too.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2019-02-10 19:30:57 Re: Commit Fest 2019-01 is now closed
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-02-10 18:22:37 Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)