| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Hash index bucket split bug |
| Date: | 2026-10-10 15:27:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=nK1Rih58f+rOwgMvd6ejX-=-v9B=6OdsjHJPh8i55Cg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 10, 2026 at 8:02 AM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Thanks, the fixup-patch looks good to me. However, I was thinking
> > whether it is a good idea to refactor the common code into separate
> > functions like attached? This is atop your patches.
I pushed a version of the bug fix based on this.
> One suggestion: how about adding an assertion at the end of the scan
> so that we catch this condition immediately?
I agree. The pushed patch implemented something similar.
Thanks
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2026-10-10 15:37:36 | Re: [PG19] Wrong results from NOT NULL-based expression simplification |
| Previous Message | Haibo Yan | 2026-10-10 15:27:05 | Re: [PG19] Wrong results from NOT NULL-based expression simplification |