Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Date: 2018-07-31 20:22:27
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=imVrbydSkBH95y3w7ZU7XffE7-LW0R+LjfZrXnyz-dw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> I'm a bit surprised that you decided to push to the 11 branch - the
> consensus in this thread seem to have gone the other way by my read?
> Given that that's the rule, and pushing non-fixes is the exception, I'm
> not particularly ok with just ignoring that?

+1

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2018-07-31 20:31:24 Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partition wise join enabled.
Previous Message Andres Freund 2018-07-31 20:17:00 Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?