Re: infobits_set WAL record struct field is int8

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Subject: Re: infobits_set WAL record struct field is int8
Date: 2023-04-11 20:55:50
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=hs54C-DKsHPkz=+NT0gwnvOCh4H+rrFLTmySMWGpxWw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 1:48 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Makes sense. Looks like there never was a flag defined for the sign bit,
> luckily. I assume you're just going to apply this for HEAD?

Yes.

I'm also going to rename the TransactionId field to "xmax", for
consistency with nearby very similar records (like
xl_heap_lock_updated).

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-04-11 21:12:58 Re: Various typo fixes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2023-04-11 20:54:53 Re: Assertion being hit during WAL replay