Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Mark Dilger <mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Borisov <pashkin(dot)elfe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #17212: pg_amcheck fails on checking temporary relations
Date: 2021-10-13 21:09:48
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=gNyNoj2BBSjf8qC=w5tTnthfuXWn96oh3rrZWd6YQkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 7:22 PM Mark Dilger
<mark(dot)dilger(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I agree that it is unlikely to make much difference in practice.

> I don't feel strongly about this. If you'd like me to remove those checks, I can do so. These are just my thoughts on the subject.

Okay. I don't feel strongly about it either.

I just pushed v4, with the additional minor pg_amcheck documentation
updates we talked about. No other changes.

Thanks again
--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2021-10-13 22:58:10 Re: BUG #17227: segmentation fault with jsonb_to_recordset
Previous Message Tom Lane 2021-10-13 20:54:52 Re: BUG #17227: segmentation fault with jsonb_to_recordset

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2021-10-13 21:15:17 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-10-13 20:46:53 Re: prevent immature WAL streaming