| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Christoph Berg <christoph(dot)berg(at)credativ(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h |
| Date: | 2017-12-15 23:36:00 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=Y7Y7wnD9Anx=C3tNM974U2L1aEOeUyit0Drh7J8x2NA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Why not fixing that? Reproducible builds are a trend of these days,
>> and what's proposed here is really simple to make PG more compliant
>> with this purpose in mind.
>
> It's not like $0 instead of a hardcoded name in the header actually buys
> us anything afaict.
+1.
I think that reproducible builds are a worthwhile goal, and I welcome
Christoph's continued work on them.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2017-12-15 23:39:05 | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-12-15 23:21:41 | Re: Reproducible builds: genbki.pl vs schemapg.h |