Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Date: 2019-11-16 02:03:01
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=VmTwRwY5t+0Ekj-zWTGwc6DHi93OpvspmxP_1sYDs9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 5:43 PM Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/13/19 11:51 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> > Can you suggest an alternative?
>
> Dupression

This suggestion makes me feel better about "deduplication".

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-11-16 02:18:49 Re: [HACKERS] [PROPOSAL] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.
Previous Message Mark Dilger 2019-11-16 01:43:39 Re: [HACKERS] [WIP] Effective storage of duplicates in B-tree index.