| From: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG bug fix: DECALRE STATEMENT and DEALLOCATE, DESCRIBE |
| Date: | 2021-08-09 23:20:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAH2-Wz=RXDbnqXBQ+mtN_0k52zvxWSzxBCbW7G38buAj3MYOng@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021 at 3:51 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > I think that there was a snowballing effect here. We both made
> > mistakes that compounded. I apologize for my role in this whole mess.
>
> I do think all committers need to understand the role of the RMT so they
> can respond appropriately. Do we need to communicate this better?
I think that it makes sense to codify the practical expectations that
the community has of existing committers, at least to some degree. I
mean why wouldn't we? The resulting document (an addition to the
"committers" Postgres wiki page?) would inevitably leave certain
questions open to interpretation. That seems okay to me.
I don't feel qualified to write this myself. Just my opinion.
--
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2021-08-09 23:31:41 | Re: Another regexp performance improvement: skip useless paren-captures |
| Previous Message | Zhihong Yu | 2021-08-09 23:10:27 | Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements? |