Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
To: Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix
Date: 2020-05-24 17:33:48
Message-ID: CAH2-Wz=Pm=wdTYDD1HU-j-BjGkCMpRfz=tS3gb6p=JB9W0tUCw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 2:52 AM Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> There was news in Phoronix about the Beta 1 Release of Postgres (1).
> Unfortunately for Postgres advocacy it does not bring good news,
> it is showing regressions in the benchmarks compared to version 12.
> Without going into the technical merits of how the test was done,
> they have no way of knowing whether such regressions actually exist or if it is a failure of how the tests were done.

This shellscript appears to be used by Phoronix to run pgbench:

https://github.com/phoronix-test-suite/phoronix-test-suite/blob/f0f8c726f2700faea363f176a4b28dab026d45d0/ob-cache/test-profiles/pts/pgbench-1.8.4/install.sh

It looks like they're only running pgbench for 60 second runs in all
configurations -- notice that "-T 60" is passed to pgbench. I'm not
entirely sure that that's all that there is to it. Still, there isn't
any real attempt to make it clear what's going on here. I have my
doubts about how representative these numbers are for that reason.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ranier Vilela 2020-05-24 17:50:08 Re: PostgresSQL 13.0 Beta 1 on Phoronix
Previous Message Fabien COELHO 2020-05-24 11:36:59 Re: Default gucs for EXPLAIN